Government of Ontario
Home
What's New
Calendar of Events
Products
News Releases
Vegetable Update for December 20, 2007
| Agriphones and Crop Updates Index Page |

Want to be notified when new agriphones/crop updates are added?
Use our subscription service to subscribe or unsubscribe.


VEGETABLE CROP UPDATE

TOMATO & PEPPER EDITION

Janice LeBoeuf, OMAFRA Vegetable Crop Specialist

Southwest Ag Conference: Topics of Interest to Vegetable Growers
TOMcast Report 2007
Minor Use Registration for Aphids and Potato Beetle on Field Peppers
Soil Moisture Monitoring Tool: A Comparison
Soil Moisture Monitoring Equipment Suppliers

*   Southwest Ag Conference: Topics of Interest to Vegetable Growers

The theme of the 15th Annual Southwest Agricultural Conference is “Innovative Farming Solutions”.  It will be held on January 3rd and 4th at Ridgetown Campus – University of Guelph.  Although it’s primarily a field crop event, there will be a number of topics that may benefit you in your vegetable operations as well.

Topic 45: Advanced IPM for Vegetable Production
J. LeBoeuf, OMAFRA
 From monitoring to management, the best and most practical techniques that you’re not using yet.

Topic 18: Rhizobotany: The Root of Agriculture
R. Zobel, USDA-ARS
A practical look at the role of roots and the impact of what we do.

Topic 19: Cover Crops – Red Clover and More!
B. Deen, Univ. of Guelph; L. Van Eerd, Ridgetown Campus – UG
Putting cover crops to work for Ontario farmers – the latest in applied cover crop research findings.

Topic 15: Dealing With the Impact of Soil Disruption from On-Farm Construction
J. Burns, Croton; L. McMurphy, Thamesville; D. Core, Bright’s Grove

Considerations before, ways to mitigate during and amend after construction of wind turbines, pipelines, municipal drains, etc.

Topic 14: Clean Water Act – Agony or Opportunity
T. Ryan, GRCA; B. Bedggood, Thames-Sydenham & Region Source Protection Committee
What will be the impact of the Clean Water Act and where does agriculture fit?

Topic 17: Getting the Most From Your Soil Tests
A. McCallum, McCallum Agronomic Service; K. Reid, OMAFRA
Learn what a soil test can (and can not) tell you about your soil.  This hands-on session will help find ways to manage your fertilizer dollar better.

Topic 23: Energy Savings on the Farm
W. McClournie, Ag Energy Co-operative; R. McDonald, Agviro
 A wealth of energy saving options for your farm; on-farm energy audits, financing, discounts, energy savings. 

Topic 12: Getting More out of the Technology
J. McGrail, McGrail Farm Equipment; M. Strang, Better Cropping Solutions; K. Tracey-Cowan, Ag Tech GPS

GPS, yield mapping, software, and other gadgets.  You paid for it – put it to work!

There are many more topics on farm business, alternative energy, weed identification, and innovation on the program, too.  See the conference website at www.southwestagconference.ca for full program and registration details.

*   TOMcast Report – 2007
T. Rowlandson and R. Pitblado, Weather Innovations Incorporated

The accumulation of disease severity values (DSVs) were slow in developing in 2007. The dry conditions in May, June and July produced fewer hours of leaf wetness than in recent years. These same dry conditions and often hot daytime temperatures were accompanied by cool evenings. These weather conditions that discourage fungal disease development, allowed for condensation to wet the leaves sufficient to encourage bacterial diseases like bacterial canker and spot.

From 2001 to 2006 we have been in an upward trend, increasing in DSV’s each of the past 5 years.  However, the dry season of 2007 brought this trend back down for at least one season (Figure 1).


 

Figure 1: Final TOMcast DSV map for 2007 growing season

May:  What a terrific way to start a tomato crop -- as well as other processing vegetable crops this spring. The temperatures were warm with some above normal daytime temperatures. In fact the entire southwest region reported warmer than normal days except along the Erie shores from Rondeau Bay (New Scotland line) to Colchester just south of Harrow.

These early dry, warm conditions proved beneficial as the Crop Heat Units (CHUs) were above the 30 year average, with the first monthly indications of below normal rainfall.

June:  The evenings, beginning during the third week of June, were noticeably cooler. It is often the case that after a hot day followed by a cool evening, early morning dews form. During the early part of this season the soils had been so dry, that dew had NOT formed for many hours in the evenings or early morning. This translated into low Disease Severity Values.

Tomato growers begin their fungicide spray programs when the accumulated DSVs reach 35, for those crops that are transplanted before May 15. Growers who transplant tomatoes after May 15 wait until 45 DSVs are reached. The first fungicide spray application for tomatoes in 2007 could have been delayed in Essex county and northern Chatham-Kent until the end of June. In the southern portion of Chatham-Kent, conditions had been cooler with the lack of favourable disease weather conditions delaying the onset of the initial fungicide spray application. There was one small corner of southern Essex, around Colchester, that was getting all of the rain that fell this season.

July:  The TOMcast disease severity values were low this year, as would be expected.  When surveying this crop this past year, any of the foliage that appeared to be “diseased” was often due to bacterial canker or Verticillium Wilt, neither of which are affected by fungicide spray programs. 

One weather factor that became very noticeable and critical for the production of our processing crops this season was the cooler days and evenings throughout July.  It was this factor, the cooler temperatures in July that tended to reduce the drought stress on crops in our region. The following chart shows that all of the stations were reporting below normal temperatures. This translates into CHUs that were below the 30-year normals. The figure showing the overall CHUs for the season to date, indicated by the end of July we were slightly lower, but close to our normal CHUs for southwestern Ontario (Figure 2).


Figure 2: Total Crop Heat Units for the summer of 2007 – May 1 – August 31.

Significant rainfall fell only in the Blenheim, New Scotland Line area, improving their crops tremendously. The rest of the region relied on the crop stress relieving cooler temperatures to produce the yield and quality fruit that did result this year.

Figure 3 shows the comparison between the most recent drought years in 1988 and 2005 compared to this year, 2007. Whereas in the previous drought years, sufficient rainfall eventually fell in July this was not the case in 2007.  It was only in the Blenheim (New Scotland Line) and Ridgetown areas that received higher rainfall in July.  All other regions remained dry compared to 1988 and 2005 month of July.

Figure 3:  Rainfall comparison between the drought years of 1988, 2005 and 2007 in the month of July.

August:  The cooler temperatures in July and certainly the wetter conditions in August provided the conditions that allowed growers to turn a potentially disastrous year into a ‘normal” production year. Thank goodness for the August rains.

Many places were short of CHUs in August. This was due to our cooler night temperatures. The delay in crop growth in the Blenheim and Cedar Springs area gained in August. Throughout this growing season we experienced hot days, but often cool night temperatures. These extremes have given rise to the presumption that this has been an extremely hot season. Many of you who do not have air conditioning and instead rely on the open window breezes at night, remarked how comfortable sleeping had been this summer - cool nights, hot days. When examining the entire summer, we were actually slightly BEHIND in total CHUs for the reasons mentioned above.

When taking the total rainfall amounts and comparing them as a percentage you can readily observe that the red areas suffered the most due to lack of rainfall in 2007 (Figure 4). The Niagara region was the driest followed by the Simcoe area. The August rainfalls made the dry summer of 2007 in Essex and Kent look not so bad after all. Any area with a green to blue colour received more than the 30 year normal rainfall.  Eastern Ontario, especially in the Ottawa Valley received higher than normal rainfall.

 


Figure 4:  Rainfall totals across southern Ontario in 2007

*   Minor Use Registration for Aphids and Potato Beetle on Field Peppers

J. Chaput, OMAFRA, Minor Use Coordinator, Guelph
The Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) recently announced the approval of a minor use label expansion for ASSAIL 70 WP (acetamiprid) insecticide for control of aphids and Colorado potato beetle on field peppers in Canada.Assail 70 WP was already labeled in Canada for control of aphids and potato beetle on a number of crops and crop groups.  This registration for aphids and Colorado potato beetle on field peppers, initiated in 2003, recognizes the long-standing need for effective pest management options on this very minor crop.

ASSAIL can be used for control of aphids on field peppers at a rate of 56 to 86 grams product per hectare in a minimum of 200 L water per hectare.  A maximum of 4 applications is permitted and Assail should not be applied more than every 7 days.  

ASSAIL can be used for control of Colorado potato beetle at a rate of 40-80 grams product per hectare in a minimum of 200 L water per hectare.  A maximum of 2 applications is permitted and Assail should not be applied more than every 7 days.  The designated pre-harvest interval for both pests is 7 days.

Follow all other directions for use on the Assail label carefully including beginning applications when treatment thresholds have been reached as indicated by monitoring.  

Assail should be used in an IPM program and in rotation with other management strategies to adequately manage resistance.

We wish to thank Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pest Management Centre for sponsoring this minor use submission in response to grower identified needs in 2002 and 2003.   We also wish to thank the personnel of Nippon Soda Co. Ltd. and DuPont Canada Inc. for their support of this registration and the personnel of the Pest Management Regulatory Agency for evaluating and approving this important pest management tool.  

For copies of the new supplemental label contact Janice LeBoeuf, OMAFRA, Ridgetown (519) 674-1699 or Jim Chaput, OMAFRA, Guelph (519) 826-3539.

AssailTM is a trademark of Nippon Soda Co. Ltd., Toyko, Japan.  AssailTM 70 WP insecticide is marketed by DuPont Canada Inc.

*   Soil Moisture Monitoring Tools: A Comparison

Anne Verhallen, Soil Management Specialist – Horticulture, OMAFRA, Ridgetown

 

Soil moisture measurement tools

Ease of use

Reliability

Range of soil types

Ease of automation

Portability

Observations

Cost

Feel method

- measures soil water depletion

üüü

ü

all

NA

High

Requires experience.

Open to misinterpretation.

Operator time

Soil samples

(gravimetric)

- measures water content by mass

üüü

üü

all

NA

High

 

Time consuming and slow- lots of weighing, waiting and calculating.  Highly variable depending on sampling technique, temperature of drying etc.

Operator time – labour cost high; materials cost low

Tensiometers

- measures

soil water tension

üü

üü

Most except clays.

Easy.

Requires specialized unit and connections.

Low in season

 

Indicates when irrigation is needed, not how much.  Proper installation is critical for operation.  Placement is important to avoid damage from field operations.  High maintenance and regular checking of units needed.  Soil type dependent ie most suited for sandy soils as tension can be too high in clay soils.  In coarse sand, may require a special unit.

$100 + per unit

Usually 2 units are installed at two different depths and the units stay in one site in the field for the season

Electrical resistance blocks

(eg. Water-marks, gypsum blocks etc)

- measures soil water tension

üüü

üü

Most except clays.

Easy.

Requires datalogger and connections.

Buried for crop season but moveable from season to season.

Installation generally easy but depends on soil type.   Requires some calibration with soil type.  Sensitive to salt levels.  Low maintenance.  Low impact on field operations with appropriate placement.  Not very sensitive at high soil moisture.  Lifespan ~3 years +.  Readings are affected by soil temperature (1% per degree F).

Meter $300 + and individual units$ 40-50

Similar to tensiometers – often 2 units at different depths

TDR or FDR – Time or Frequency Domain Reflectometry

measures volumetric soil water

ü

depends upon unit used

üüü

All, but clays may pose some prob-lems.

Easy but cost prohibitive.

High.  May require installation of an access tube in the soil.

 

Cost in the past has restricted use to researchers and large scale irrigators

Depending on unit may need calibration

Insertion under dry conditions mat be difficult

FDR – sample volume 10 inches dia. Around probe

 

Cost has come down in recent years - $600 to 1000+

C-Probe

üü

- once probe is installed

üüü

all

Easy.

Requires specialized unit and connections

Can be moved but normally installed in one place for the season.

Installation generally easy but depends on soil type.

Low maintenance.

Gives graphical image of soil profile in near-real time.

Web based access.

Multiple sensor depths.

Sensor cost $1200 with data management extra.

Neutron Probe

- measures moisture content

ü

üüü

all

Unit usually too expensive.

High.  Requires installation of an access tube in the soil.

Suited to research

Uses a radioactive source of neutrons

Requires calibration

 

High cost in $1000’s.

 

*   Soil Moisture Monitoring Equipment Suppliers

Anne Verhallen, Soil Management Specialist – Horticulture, OMAFRA, RidgetownLocal suppliers like irrigation and agricultural supply dealers often offer only one or two lines of equipment. If you have difficulty in finding a specific tool, try the list below:

Supplier

Address

Phone/Fax/E-mail/Web

Equipment Offered

Campbell Scientific (Canada) Corp

11564 - 149 Street NW
Edmonton, AB T5M 1W7

Ph: (780) 454-2505

Fx: (780) 454-2655

dataloggers@campbellsci.ca

Watermark and variety of gypsum block

Variety of TDR formats – permanent of seasonal installation

Spectrum Technologies Inc.

 

23839 W. Andrew Road

Plainfield, Illinois 60544           

 

Ph: 1-800-248-8873

www.specmeters.com

Watermark sensors; Watchdog loggers and irrigation stations; TDR – portable meters

ECHO soil moisture sensors; Irrometer tensiometers; Soil probes

Hortau

735, de l'Église
St
-Romuald, QC G6W 5M6

Ph: (418) 839-2852

or 1-888-5-HORTAU
Fx: (418) 839-2851

info@hortau.com 

http://www.hortau.com/

Wireless tensiometers

Weather Innovations Incorporated (WIN)

7159 Queen’s Line

R.R. 5 Chatham, ON N7M 5J5

Ph: (519) 352-5334

Fx: (519) 352-7630

www.weatherinnovations.com

Provides weather and growing condition monitoring equipment  including C Probe and Echo probes

Eijkelkamp

Note: this is a supplier of very high quality research tools. 

Agrisearch Equipment

P.O. Box 4

6987 ZG Giesbeek

Nijverheidsstraat 30,

The Netherlands

Ph: 31 313 880200

www.eijkelkamp.com

 

 

Variety of TDR units

Gypsum blocks and Watermarks

E.S.I. Environmental Sensors Inc.

100 - 4243 Glanford Avenue
Victoria, BC V8Z 4B9

 

Ph: (250) 479-6588
or 1-800-799-6324
Fx: (250) 479-1412

info@esica.com

www.esica.com

Moisture point and Gro-point TDR

Gemplers

 

Corporate Sales
P.O. Box 44993
Madison, WI 53744-4993

Ph: 1-800-382-8473

or (608) 662-3301
Fx: (608) 662-3360

corpsales@gemplers.com

www.gemplers.com   

Watermark sensors

Irrometer tensiometers

Ben Meadows Company

PO Box 5277
Janesville WI 53547-5277

Ph: 1-800-241-6401

Fx: 1-800-628-2068

www.benmeadows.com/

Watermarks and other gypsum blocks

Soil Moisture Equipment Corp.

801 S. Kellogg Ave. 
Goleta, CA 93117


Ph: (805) 964-3525
Fx: (805) 683-2189

www.soilmoisture.com/index.html

Tensiometers

Variety of TDR type equipment

 

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to All!

Questions?  Comments?

Give me a call at (519) 674-1699 or email janice.leboeuf@ontario.ca


| Crops Home Page |